Worst Judging Decisions in UFC History: Top 10 Robberies
The worst judging decisions in UFC history, ranked: Garcia over Phan, Sanchez over Pearson, Machida over Shogun and GSP over Hendricks, with every scorecard cited.

The worst judging decision in UFC history is Leonard Garcia over Nam Phan at the TUF 12 Finale in 2010, a split decision that every media scorer in the building gave to Phan. Ross Pearson, Shogun Rua, Johny Hendricks and Jared Gordon round out the top five robberies on this list.
The criteria are simple. We looked at the official scorecards, the media scores collected by MMADecisions, the UFCStats strike numbers and what the people involved said afterward. A close fight that could have gone either way is not a robbery. A fight where 14 of 14 media outlets scored it for the loser is.
Judges are named because their cards are public record. Scores, strike totals and quotes below come from MMADecisions, UFCStats and the reports linked at the bottom.
- No. 1 robbery
- Garcia def. Phan, TUF 12 Finale, Dec. 4, 2010
- Media scores vs Garcia
- 5 of 5 for Phan
- Most lopsided media
- GSP-Hendricks, 16 of 16 for Hendricks
- Biggest strike gap
- Condit 176 to Lawler 92 (sig. strikes)
- Oldest on the list
- Bisping def. Hamill, UFC 75, Sept. 8, 2007
01Leonard Garcia def. Nam Phan

The Ultimate Fighter 12 Finale, Dec. 4, 2010, The Pearl at the Palms, Las Vegas. Split decision: Adalaide Byrd 29-28 Garcia, Tony Weeks 29-28 Garcia, Junichiro Kamijo 30-27 Phan. Phan landed 102 significant strikes at 44 percent. Garcia landed 64 at 22 percent, swinging wild hooks that mostly hit air and apparently looked good from ringside.
All five media scores on MMADecisions went to Phan, three of them 30-27. Sherdog named it the 2010 Robbery of the Year and the worst decision ever. Phan said he did not see how Garcia won any of the rounds, and that even cosmetically, if you throw a lot of punches you still have to hit the guy. Garcia later admitted he had worked his style into a judge-favoring position. Both got $30,000 for Fight of the Night, which is its own kind of punchline.
02Diego Sanchez def. Ross Pearson

UFC Fight Night 42, June 7, 2014, Tingley Coliseum, Albuquerque. Split decision for the hometown fighter: Jeff Collins 30-27 Sanchez, Chris Tellez 29-28 Sanchez, Marcos Rosales 30-27 Pearson. Pearson outlanded Sanchez 51 to 33 in significant strikes, dropped him in round two and took him down. Sanchez landed at 24 percent.
Fourteen of 14 media scores went to Pearson, 13 of them 30-27. Dana White said Pearson got robbed, called a judge giving Sanchez the second round insanity, and paid Pearson his win bonus anyway. He added that whoever gave Sanchez all three rounds should never judge a fight again. Sherdog's 2014 Robbery of the Year.
03Lyoto Machida def. Mauricio "Shogun" Rua

UFC 104, Oct. 24, 2009, Staples Center, Los Angeles. Unanimous decision for the champion, 48-47 from Nelson Hamilton, Cecil Peoples and Marcos Rosales. Rua kicked Machida's legs and body for 25 minutes and landed 80 significant strikes to 35.
All five media scores went to Rua, one of them 50-45. Dana White said he thought Shogun won and that he did not see how the judges did not see what everybody else saw. Machida and Rua agreed to an immediate rematch the next day, and the belt changed hands when they ran it back.
04Georges St-Pierre def. Johny Hendricks

UFC 167, Nov. 16, 2013, MGM Grand Garden Arena, Las Vegas. Split decision: Sal D'Amato 48-47 St-Pierre, Tony Weeks 48-47 St-Pierre, Glenn Trowbridge 48-47 Hendricks. Rounds two through five were scored the same on every card. Round one decided the fight, and Hendricks had out-controlled St-Pierre 5:27 to 2:52 over the fight while landing 142 total strikes to 125.
Sixteen of 16 media scores went to Hendricks. Dana White called the Nevada commission atrocious and said the governor needed to step in before they destroyed the sport the way they did boxing. Nevada's Keith Kizer answered that the last four rounds were scored unanimously and the first could have gone either way. That is the problem in one sentence.
05Paddy Pimblett def. Jared Gordon
UFC 282, Dec. 10, 2022, T-Mobile Arena, Las Vegas. Unanimous decision, 29-28 from Douglas Crosby, Chris Lee and Ron McCarthy. Gordon landed 100 total strikes to 97 at a far higher rate, 58 percent to 40, took Pimblett down three times and controlled him for 6:28. Pimblett had 35 seconds of control and zero takedowns.
Twenty-three of 24 media scores went to Gordon, 11 of them 30-27. Gordon said everyone knew he was robbed. Dana White went after Gordon instead, calling his game plan horrible and saying he threw the fight away. Eighty-eight percent of fan scores on MMADecisions had Gordon.
06Michael Bisping def. Matt Hamill

UFC 75, Sept. 8, 2007, The O2 Arena, London. Split decision for the local fighter: Jeff Mullen 29-28 Bisping, Cecil Peoples 29-28 Bisping, Chris Watts 30-27 Hamill. Hamill landed 56 significant strikes to 47 at a better rate, 88 total to 65, and completed six of 12 takedowns with more than four minutes of control. Bisping had zero takedowns.
This one is the outlier on the list because the two media scores MMADecisions lists both had Bisping. The crowd and the fighters did not. Hamill said he thought he won, while giving Bisping credit for a fair fight. Bisping, asked about the decision, said of course he won and told the questioner where to go. Three quarters of fan scores had Hamill, and Sherdog put it in its all-time top 10.
07Robbie Lawler def. Carlos Condit
UFC 195, Jan. 2, 2016, MGM Grand Garden Arena, Las Vegas. Split decision for the champion: Derek Cleary 48-47 Lawler, Chris Lee 48-47 Lawler, Tony Weeks 48-47 Condit. Round three was the swing round. Condit landed 176 significant strikes to 92, though at 35 percent against Lawler's 51, and Lawler scored the only knockdown.
Fifteen of 20 media scores had Condit, two had a draw, three had Lawler. Dana White said he scored it three rounds to two for Condit. Condit, who considered retirement afterward, said it was not his night. This is the most defensible decision in the top seven because Lawler's shots were heavier. It is still a decision most people who watched it got wrong in the champion's favor.
08Alexander Volkanovski def. Max Holloway 2
UFC 251, July 12, 2020, Fight Island, Abu Dhabi. Split decision for the champion: Mark Collett 48-47 Volkanovski, Clemens Werner 48-47 Volkanovski, David Lethaby 48-47 Holloway. All three judges gave Holloway rounds one and two. Volkanovski took rounds three through five on two cards, and round three was the one that split them.
Eighteen of 27 media scores had Holloway. Volkanovski outlanded him 137 to 102 in significant strikes over the fight and landed three takedowns, so the case for the champion exists. Dana White did not buy it. He said you cannot leave it to these guys, that there was bad judging, and asked the room whether anybody in the media had it for Volkanovski. The trilogy at UFC 276 settled it 50-45 three times.
09Jon Jones def. Dominick Reyes

UFC 247, Feb. 8, 2020, Toyota Center, Houston. Unanimous decision for the champion: Chris Lee 48-47 Jones, Marcos Rosales 48-47 Jones, Joe Soliz 49-46 Jones. Reyes won the first two rounds on every card and landed 116 significant strikes to 104. Jones landed at 62 percent to Reyes' 44 and got two of nine takedowns.
Fourteen of 21 media scores had Reyes 48-47. The card that still gets talked about is Soliz giving Jones four rounds, which almost nobody else watching could find. Reyes said he went out there and won the fight, and that he called it 3-2 in his post-fight interview before the cards were read.
10Alex Pereira def. Jan Blachowicz
UFC 291, July 29, 2023, Delta Center, Salt Lake City. Split decision: Derek Cleary 29-28 Pereira, Ron McCarthy 29-28 Pereira, Junichiro Kamijo 29-28 Blachowicz. Everyone gave Blachowicz round one, when he controlled Pereira on the mat for 4:50. Everyone gave Pereira round two. Round three decided it.
This is the honest number 10: 22 of 26 media scores had Pereira, so it is not a consensus robbery. It is here because the numbers are strange. Blachowicz took Pereira down three times, controlled him for 7:32 of a 15-minute fight and attempted two submissions. Pereira had six seconds of control and landed 70 significant strikes to 52, most of them at close range. Blachowicz posted that a bunch of thieves robbed him and that he would be back.
I have watched enough of these from a few miles down the road to know the pattern. The robberies are almost never about corruption. They are about judges rewarding volume they can see over damage they cannot, and about hometown noise doing what noise does. Garcia over Phan is number one because there is no argument on the other side, not even a bad one. Pimblett over Gordon bothers me more than its ranking suggests, because the UFC's response was to blame the guy who got robbed. Lawler vs Condit and Jones vs Reyes are on here knowing people will tell me they were close. Close is fine. Close is what the sport is. What is not fine is a 49-46 card for Jones or a 30-27 for Sanchez. If you want fewer robberies, hire judges who have trained, publish their cards round by round, and let the open scoring experiment run. Until then, finish the fight.
QUESTIONS PEOPLE ASK.
What is the worst decision in UFC history?
Leonard Garcia's split decision over Nam Phan at the TUF 12 Finale on Dec. 4, 2010 is the most cited answer and the top entry here. Phan landed 102 significant strikes to Garcia's 64, every media outlet tracked by MMADecisions scored it for Phan, and Sherdog named it the worst decision of all time. Two judges, Adalaide Byrd and Tony Weeks, gave Garcia rounds one and three.
Why are there so many bad decisions in MMA?
Three rounds of five minutes leave little room for error, so one wrong round swings a fight. Judges score under the 10-point must system borrowed from boxing, with limited training on grappling and damage, and they sit at cage level where they often cannot see the far side of the Octagon. Volume that looks busy can beat damage that lands, which is what happened in Garcia vs Phan and Sanchez vs Pearson.
Did Dana White ever overturn a judging decision?
No. The UFC cannot change results, which are controlled by the athletic commission that regulates each event. What White has done is pay fighters as if they won, as he did for Ross Pearson after UFC Fight Night 42, publicly attack commissions, as he did after St-Pierre vs Hendricks, and book immediate rematches, as he did for Shogun Rua after UFC 104.
Was GSP vs Hendricks really a robbery?
By the numbers it was the most one-sided media verdict on this list: all 16 outlets on MMADecisions scored it 48-47 for Hendricks. The judges agreed on rounds two through five, so round one decided it, and Hendricks landed more total strikes and had nearly twice the control time. Nevada's executive director Keith Kizer said the first round could have gone either way. Most people who watched it disagreed.
Which judges appear most often in controversial UFC decisions?
Several names repeat on this list. Cecil Peoples scored Machida over Shogun and Bisping over Hamill. Tony Weeks had Garcia over Phan and St-Pierre over Hendricks, though he was the dissenting judge for Condit at UFC 195. Marcos Rosales had Machida and Jones, but was the lone judge for Pearson. Judges work hundreds of rounds, so a few bad cards do not define a career, but the cards are public and worth knowing.
- Leonard Garcia def. Nam Phan, TUF 12 Finale (MMA Decisions)
- Sherdog's Top 10: Worst Decisions
- Diego Sanchez def. Ross Pearson, UFC Fight Night 42 (MMA Decisions)
- Dana White Awards Ross Pearson $30,000 Win Bonus (LowKick MMA)
- Machida, Rua Agree to Immediate Rematch (Sherdog)
- Georges St-Pierre def. Johny Hendricks, UFC 167 (MMA Decisions)
- Keith Kizer: UFC 167 Controversy More About Dana White's Comments (LowKick MMA)
- Dana White Blasts Jared Gordon's Horrible Game Plan (Sherdog)
- Dana White on Volkanovski beating Holloway: We got some bad judging (LowKick MMA)
- Dominick Reyes: I went out there and I won that fight (Bloody Elbow)
Figures in this piece come from the sources above; purses, deals and net worth totals are estimates unless a commission or the fighter disclosed them. Spotted an error? Send a correction.


